Stakeholders Map

In workshop 3, we were asked to create a stakeholder’s map based on our project topic. We had a homework for workshop 3, to identify stakeholders. In the workshop, we analyze our individual homework and prioritize the key stakeholders. Then we create a stakeholder map which picture is given below.


Figure: Sateholder's map

As our project is about future classroom environment, so we choose Board of directors and the government as a keep satisfied block, as media has always interest on some new projects and new technologies, so we keep media as a Monitor block. We keep other departments, researcher and supporting stuffs in monitor sections. As they all are the stakeholders of our project and they have low power and low interest that’s why we keep them there. In our project, students and teachers are most important stakeholders and they have high power with high interest, so we keep them in manage closely sections. Parents of students and the companies who are sponsoring have high interest in this project, but they have less power, so we separate them in keep informed blocks.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Proof of Concept

Image
Above you could see our presentation about the proof of concept and MVP testing. Testing was done to achieve proof that our idea would be supported by user and it would fix the problem we chose. As explained the MVP test was done with the storyboard comic and open discussion about the idea. We asked few opening question for the conversation to start like "What do you think about?". People we interview were all very open minded and very talkative so it was easy kept feedback. We showed the comic to the 4 students (university, vocational school) and to 2 adult students (Adult education center). They were from age 21 to 32, 4 women and 2 men.
Read more

Prototype building

Image
Building of the prototype took place in TUT language center were we captured one big table for ourselves and spread all our things. We started with taking measures of our test persons (the dolls) and fixed the part drawings to match this size. After this we decided that everybody should do one proto and after finishing we could choose which one is the best for user evaluation. So, we went to work by using milk cardboard and different size of packets, glue, tape, wire, scissors and box cutter. Everyone took a different route combining the parts for the chair (parts represented in last blog post). It was fun and we discussed on the way if someone had hard to add next part in their design. The hardest thing to do was the turning from the chair to the treadmill. We had a lot of discussion and ended up with three different ways for the idea. When all was finished we compared the designs. We were happy with all but chose one to be our main prototype that could be used in...
Read more

Ideation

Image
Workshop started with solo ideation. Brainstorming solo brought us seven ideas. After the solo thinking we changed papers and tried to come up ideas based on team mate’s ideas. With this we came up with five ideas. After these parts we looked through all the ideas this was and counted there to be twelve of them. We then added them on board with pots-it notes. Next round of our ideation was reversed brainstorming. Which meant that we had to come up with the most crazy or bad idea we could think of. With this we got seven ideas you can see in the picture. So now we had total of 19 ideas to evaluate. We choose three criteria to find what could be the most useful ideas for us. Our criteria were: Desirability Well-being Useful After voting from our ideas we had three best ideas to go with: Wide display Good: Better flexibility, you don’t have to be in the specific place to addend the lecture. Change environment of the classroom. Better visibility Bad: Lack of concentr...
Read more